Legal Ruling and Response
The 10th District Court of Appeals of Ohio ruled that the state's ban on gender-affirming care for minors, including puberty blockers and hormone treatments, is unconstitutional, violating the state constitution and parental rights.
announced plans to appeal the decision, emphasizing his commitment to protecting what he termed "unprotected children." The , representing the plaintiffs, celebrated the ruling as a historic victory for transgender youth and their families.
Legislative Background and Future Implications
The ban, part of House Bill 68, was initially vetoed by Governor , who cited concerns over suicide risks among minors with gender dysphoria. However, the legislature overridden the veto, making the 23rd state to implement such a ban.
The court's decision specifically addresses the prohibition of hormone treatments and puberty blockers, leaving the ban on surgical care for trans minors untouched. This ruling potentially sets the stage for further legal battles, as it only partially overturns the broader restrictions imposed by HB 68.