Legal Arguments and Perspectives
The is deliberating whether to overturn the 's 2022 decision, which reduced compensation for new rooftop solar customers, amidst a debate on the legal standards used and the decision's alignment with state law.
Environmental groups argue the CPUC's decision violated state law by not considering all benefits of solar energy and its impact on disadvantaged communities, while the CPUC and the Attorney General defend the decision as legally sound and well-reasoned.
Impact and Implications
The policy change, which slashed compensation rates by up to 80%, has led to a significant decrease in solar panel installations and customer connections, raising concerns about the future of renewable energy in California.
Critics argue the decision undermines the state's renewable energy goals and places an unfair burden on non-solar customers, while proponents claim it addresses a cost shift and ensures fairness among all utility customers.